A Return to Oil Painting

February 24, 2008

Shallot and Three Garlic Heads

Filed under: painting — Matthew @ 9:07 am
Shallot and Three Garlic Heads 8 x 10 inches (25.6 x 20.5 centimeters), original oil on gallery wrapped canvas Matthew Stiles
Completed October 2007
10 x 8 inches (25.6 x 20.5 centimeters)
oil on gallery wrapped canvas.

During the process of this painting I had an awful time with my white. I was trying out Winton Titanium and have to say it’s the worst paint I’ve ever used! It had low tinting strength, something I never expected to find in a titanium white, as it’s known to be over powering in most cases. It also had a strange consistency, sticky and strokes with my brushes didn’t flow as I am accustomed.

At first I blamed it on my rusty senses, after all, it had been months since college, and my last show. I figured the one painting prior (in which I did not use the Winton titanium) was a fluke and that I had lost my touch. After a few wipe offs I started to focus on impasto marks rather than the smooth gradations I had thought to produce. It worked out in the end.

This is also the point in which I started to question my fixation on getting super realistic smooth (reproduction like) paintings done.

I have one painting that I abandon between the last and previous. It was to be of a silver bowl from my great grandfathers estate and some bad tasting apples from Aldi. However, a visiting guest moved my still-life setup on the table.

Anyone who has really looked at silver knows that it would be difficult to get the same reflections, yet alone the same positions and catch lights from the cloth. I was angry at first as I and spent quite a deal of time on the grissaile but in the end I decided it was all right. I have since destroyed the piece, I just lost heart in it.

February 10, 2008

Onion and Garlic Head

Filed under: painting, personal — Matthew @ 9:24 am
Onion and Garlic Head 8×10 alla prima oil painting by Matthew D. Stiles 2007

Completed October 2007
8 x 10 inches (20.5 x 25.6 centimeters)
oil on gallery wrapped canvas.

This is the first time I started using my now standardized signature. It was an intentional move towards professionalism that I felt I needed to make.

All during my college years I tended to shy away from signing works, or I simply used my initials and the short year form (EX. MDS07). Reasons were many, but mostly focused on the fact that I have very ragged handwriting, and being a lefty (and wanting to always sign in the bottom right corner) has always posed some problems with getting it on there cleanly. It had never occurred to me to develop a signature until reading a discussion on a website about the merits of doing so.

Thus, I took the larger portion of a night to develop something that I felt was both artistic enough to include on any of my future paintings, but also legible, so that, after viewing or purchasing one of my works I could be looked up with ease.

The other aspect that really struck me during the discussion was that many people only used their initials and felt they were unique, what a mistake. There are only so many letters, and many people have similar styles, it’s just bound to create confusion.

I’ve recently contemplated adding my middle initial into the mix, but I wonder about the necessity of such a move. On the one had it would reduce possible confusion with other potential artists in the future, but it would also further increase my signatures size, and it is already quite long enough in my opinion. Of course, I also run into the issue that my name matthewstiles.com is already owned by another “artist.”

Here’s a few pages of the signatures I tried out:

test signatures sketch

February 1, 2008

Release and Consent form

Filed under: materials, painting, thoughts — Matthew @ 2:41 pm

I feel this is an important document for all artists, a release and consent form is required for all people that you paint. Portrait commissions, relatives, and friends are no exception. It’s also important that you get one signed right away, before any work is done. I suggest mentioning that you’ll need one signed during your recruitment process as it will quickly weed out those unwilling to do so.

Here’s the one I’ve used in the past (someone else wrote it and I do not have the reference):

 

Release and Consent

I [name of model/sitter], for good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, consent for all purposes to the reproduction and/or use of photographs, video and/or artistic rendering of me and/or information I have provided during interviews, with or without the use of my name, by artists and/or agents of [your name goes here] or by any periodical or other publication in all forms and media and in all manners, including advertising, trade, display, editorial art and exhibition. In giving this consent I release [your name goes here] from liability for any violation of any personal or proprietary right I may have in connection with such reproduction or use. I am more than eighteen years of age, or the parent or legal guardian if the model named herein is under eighteen years of age.

Print Name________________ Signature ________________ Date___________

Print Name________________ Signature ________________ Date___________

While you may think that something like this is ridiculous you should also note that people’s opinions and emotions often get the better of them, and because of this you don’t want to create a situation that could cause you to loose your work or be sued for any reason.

For instance, after you’ve used a portrait of a client whose title is their name in a magazine publication, they decide they would rather not have name or likeness in a magazine because they have been charged with a crime. Because of the release, you are safe from possible action on the clients part due to failure to seek permission for using the persons identity and name in the publication.

There are of course times when you won’t be able to get someone to sign a release, at times like this it’s best not to work with them and find someone else. There are many willing models that are more than reasonable and understand why a release is needed.

In relation to this I also suggest you stay far away from reproducing copyrighted characters (such as Disney), others photographs, or digital renderings (unless granted permission), or sports figures (unless you have the required agreement and documentation with their league). I have known of artists who have not heeded this advice and have had to destroy their work or face legal action. It’s both frightening and saddening.

Artists need to cover their butts just like every other profession where people are involved. Please take the time to do so, for all our sakes.

Blog at WordPress.com.